<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Railo Blog - Comparison</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm</link>
<description>The Railo development blog</description>
<language>de-de</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:41:03 +0200</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:27:00 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>contact@getrailo.org</managingEditor>
<webMaster>contact@getrailo.org</webMaster>
<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
<itunes:category text="Technology" />
<itunes:category text="Technology">
<itunes:category text="Podcasting" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Technology">
<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
</itunes:category>
<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
<itunes:author></itunes:author>
<itunes:owner>
<itunes:email>contact@getrailo.org</itunes:email>
<itunes:name></itunes:name>
</itunes:owner>
<itunes:image href="" />

<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<item>
<title>Struct addressing in Railo</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2008/11/17/Struct-addressing-in-Railo</link>
<description>
There is a major difference in how Railo addresses structs in comparison to the CFML standard. The result is that implicit addressing, (as I call it) works in the CFML standard but not in Railo. This is an issue we are long aware of AND we will NOT fix it.
[More]
</description>
<category>Railo 3.0</category>
<category>HowTo</category>
<category>CFML</category>
<category>Performance</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<category>Standards</category>
<category>Testing</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:27:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2008/11/17/Struct-addressing-in-Railo</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Query caching in Railo and CFMX</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2008/4/17/Query-caching-in-Railo-and-CFMX</link>
<description>
Caching queries is something that one should use since it can dramatically speed up the delivery of a page.
[More]
</description>
<category>Railo 2.0</category>
<category>Performance</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:05:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2008/4/17/Query-caching-in-Railo-and-CFMX</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scheduled tasks and request timeout</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2008/4/11/Scheduled-tasks-and-request-timeout</link>
<description>
Discussions with clients revealed that there is a general misunderstanding about the timeout setting in the definitions of scheduled tasks.
[More]
</description>
<category>Railo 2.0</category>
<category>Security</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<category>Features</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:05:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2008/4/11/Scheduled-tasks-and-request-timeout</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Performance again</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/6/15/Performance-again</link>
<description>
Today another performance comparison was posted in a private blog.
[More]
</description>
<category>Railo 2.0</category>
<category>Performance</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:45:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/6/15/Performance-again</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Silence</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/3/22/Silence</link>
<description>
A major disadvantage of generated code is the size of the generated html. When you have something like &amp;lt;cfscript&gt; this may not be an issue
since the complete code generates no output unless you use something like echo() or writeOutput().
[More]
</description>
<category>Performance</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<category>Features</category>
<category>Railo 1.1</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:33:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/3/22/Silence</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Strange Caching</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/2/21/Strange-Caching</link>
<description>
A thing I noticed while playing with some performance tests is that MX has a strange behaviour when caching queries.
Well in fact I guess it is not strange but worth mentioning.
[More]
</description>
<category>Performance</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:14:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/2/21/Strange-Caching</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shaken not Stirred &apos;007</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/1/30/Shaken-not-Stirred-007</link>
<description>
&lt;h3&gt;(geschüttelt nicht gerührt)&lt;/h3&gt;
We have intercepted a message addressed to headquarters telling us some strange but interesting things might happen towards the end of May &apos;007
somewhere in Scottland. All we found out was that a conference &lt;a href=&quot;http://scotch.scottishcfug.com/index.cfm&quot;&gt;Scotch on the rocks &apos;007&lt;/a&gt;
will take place on May, 31 and June 1. We decided to send Sean Bont, a Bont Girl and Kiu to attend the conference.&lt;br&gt;
[More]
</description>
<category>Presentation</category>
<category>Conference</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<category>Features</category>
<category>Railo 1.1</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:48:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2007/1/30/Shaken-not-Stirred-007</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Railo Performance Test</title>
<link>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2006/12/14/Railo-Performance-Test</link>
<description>
Why not?&lt;br&gt;
Mark Drew started a small test comparing the different engines in terms of performance. Since some of the engines did not finish as good as expected, the comments on the blog entry reflected that atomar tests are not so significant and a real field test should be done.&lt;br&gt;
This was something that Vince Bonfanti proposed and done this week. The results can be read &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm?mode=entry&amp;entry=97A790C6-13C3-71E3-27BA15D212DA96A1&quot;&gt;in Vince&apos;s blog&lt;/a&gt;. A couple of people wanted Railo to be compared to the other engines as well. So I used the same code Vince used in order to test the performance of Railo in comparison to the other engines.&lt;br&gt;
[More]
</description>
<category>Performance</category>
<category>Comparison</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:42:00 +0200</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.railo.ch/blog/index.cfm/2006/12/14/Railo-Performance-Test</guid>
</item>
</channel></rss>